mdregister
07-18-2004, 11:21
Hi ALL,
I am having some difficulty with the timing on my non-aspirated 1985 6.2L diesel.
I will explain as clearly as I can.
With the pump flange marks aligned, my MT 480 reads approx. 4* BTDC at IDLE and approx. 1* ATDC at 1300 rpm.
By advancing the timing marks approx. 1/16 inch (the width of the mark), my IDLE advances to approx. 5* BTDC and 1.5-2** at 1300rpm.
That is about as high as I can get the timing at 1300 rpm. Even if I advance the pump as far as it will go (approx. 3/16 inch) I can not get the timing to the recommended 4* at 1300 rpm. What I do get with the pump advanced all the way is a TON of smoke at high rpms/hard acceleration and a slightly rougher idle.
Why can I not advance to the recommended timing?
I believe the meter is working fine due to its consistency and my ability to alter readings by adjusting the probe.
If I go the other way with the pump marks, the meter responds as it should with the timing becoming more retarded as the rpms increase.
:help:
mike
I am having some difficulty with the timing on my non-aspirated 1985 6.2L diesel.
I will explain as clearly as I can.
With the pump flange marks aligned, my MT 480 reads approx. 4* BTDC at IDLE and approx. 1* ATDC at 1300 rpm.
By advancing the timing marks approx. 1/16 inch (the width of the mark), my IDLE advances to approx. 5* BTDC and 1.5-2** at 1300rpm.
That is about as high as I can get the timing at 1300 rpm. Even if I advance the pump as far as it will go (approx. 3/16 inch) I can not get the timing to the recommended 4* at 1300 rpm. What I do get with the pump advanced all the way is a TON of smoke at high rpms/hard acceleration and a slightly rougher idle.
Why can I not advance to the recommended timing?
I believe the meter is working fine due to its consistency and my ability to alter readings by adjusting the probe.
If I go the other way with the pump marks, the meter responds as it should with the timing becoming more retarded as the rpms increase.
:help:
mike