View Full Version : Suburban 6.5 1500 vs. 2500
mobilevet
11-23-2007, 15:35
I know that the 1500 series trucks are the 1/2 ton versions and the 2500 series are the 3/4 ton series.
My understanding is that the primary differences are the structural integrity, suspension strength, etc.; with the 2500 being the truck of choice (of the two) for towing.
Now, when it comes to the Suburban 1500 with the 6.5 diesel, I hear that because it has the diesel that the rear end is the same as the 2500. (right?)
Do the 1500's typically have higher gear ratio backends?
So - besides a lighter duty suspension what else is different?
I'm trying to figure out if I need/want a 2500 or a 1500 - I know I'm going diesel.
If I get the 1500 could I just put some air shocks on it to improve it's handling of heavy towing jobs?
Suburban 1500 rear 14 bolt semi float axles retained by c-clips smaller ring gear / carrier.
Suburban 2500 rear 14 bolt full float axles axles can be removed with wheels on the truck larger ring gear / carrier thus stronger axle.
moondoggie
11-26-2007, 11:31
Good Day!
Go to http://www.dieselsuburbans.com . Down near the bottom, click on "Diesel Suburban MUST READ". There's a chart near the bottom that's about the best compilation of what you want to know that I've ever seen.
Blessings!
mobilevet
11-26-2007, 12:46
Perfect! Thanks for the tip!
I do not have a 6.5 in either of my Suburbans, both have the 6.2's. While the 2500 is a healthier chassis, the real limiting factor with these Suburbans is the 6.2 engine. It does not have enough power to tow very much at any speed.
So here is what intrigues me and makes me wonder if there is any rhyme or reason to the Suburban 1500 vs 2500 comparisons.
I have an on the door trim labeled 2500 suburban (K). Carfax VIN check calls it a 1500. GM VIN check does not give it a label. Its GVWR is 8050lbs according to the VIN check build sheet which as I understand it makes it a 1500 supposedly and has a 3.42 G80 rear end. Note the actual sticker on the drivers door rates GVWR at 7900lbs.
It has the F engine and heavy duty tranny cooler etc and seems to be a 2500 by all respects bar its GVWR and axle ratio.
Does this then mean that possibly the 3.42 was a special order and that became the limiting factor with regards to the GVWR, in that had it been 3.73 or more it would have the 8600lb rating.
As I understand it it is not a spring thing as both 1500 and 2500 have the 6 leaf spring packs.
Hmm
cheers
Nobby
moondoggie
11-26-2007, 18:02
Good Day!
It's been suggested that they put the 3.42 gears in an otherwise 3/4 ton Sub & called it a 1500 to help with CAFE. I'm betting it's the 3.42 semi-floater that reduces the GVWR from 8600 (2500) to 8050 (1500), but I really have no way of knowing.
I'm in the interesting position of having one of each (see my signature). My pickup is a full 3/4 ton 2500, my Sub is the 1500. The only difference I've found so far is the rear axle: 4.10 full-floater in the 2500 pickup, 3.42 semi-floater in the 1500 Sub.
Blessings!
(signature in previous post)
Of course that figures being a 14 bolt 9.5" semi floater could lead to a GVWR reduction. So its not a case of the ratio itself but the axle. Why bother to label it as a 2500 then?
Now here is the thing why did they not install a 3.42 with the 10.5 to keep it a true 2500?
Or were they worried about to tall a gear for the higher weight capacity?
cheers
Nobby
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.