PDA

View Full Version : 6.5TD Cooling Solutions That Work!



More Power
03-30-2005, 09:33
This is an old retired thread that has been returned to "active duty" because of how solid the information here is - this thread dispels wrong info and provides proven right info. Most everything you read here at The Diesel Page is free, like this forum thread. However, a couple of the external links included here are linked from the subscriber section of this site. Maintaining a bulletin board forum is expensive, and we don't rely on advertiser support. You don't want a web site over-run with ads and neither do we, and no one here is in this for the money. You can help us keep the web site online and gain valuable access to the subscriber section by subscribing... Subscribe (https://www.thedieselpage.com/form.htm)

6.5TD Cooling Solutions That Work!

As we head into spring and the summer towing season, more 6.5 owners are reflecting on the cooling system challenges they may have faced in summers past. We've made available a couple of important articles from years past that discuss these challenges, and offer solutions. These articles appeared online here in the spring of 2002, and even today, some 20 odd years later, they are still important problem solvers that lead to success in owning a 6.5TD.

6.5TD Fan-Clutches - Engine Cooling Solutions (https://www.thedieselpage.com/members/features/fanclutch.htm)

Cooling the 6.5 requires a systems approach. We've talked about the importance of a clean radiator, 130-gpm water pump/dual thermostats and other system components that improve engine cooling. One often overlooked (but equally important) component in the cooling system is the ubiquitous fan-clutch. We installed a custom 6.5 fan-clutch on our 6.5TD Project engine in June of 2001, which was designed to engage sooner and improve engine cooling. This gave us an opportunity to evaluate this fan-clutch through an entire summer towing season, including a cross country tow during the peak of the summer heat, and consider fan-clutch's effect on engine cooling.

We also produced a comprehensive article in 2002 titled 6.5 Cooling Solutions (https://www.thedieselpage.com/members/features/65cooltipsc.htm) that offers additional solutions for the cooling challenges 6.5TD owners might face.

MP

autocrosser
04-04-2005, 14:50
I just pulled the grill to change the orfice on the A/C and clean the trash out of the coolers and condenser. The condenser area behind the aux coolers was completely blocked. I vacumed it and then hit it with a pressure washer to blow it all out. Well worth the time spent.

tanker
04-05-2005, 18:03
Often overlooked is the heat transfered to the cooling system from the transmission cooler lines. I installed 2 additional coolers on my 95 6.5 suburban. The best is a 12-volt fan cooler mounted under the floor, this will drop temps 70+ degrees prior to the radiator cooler.
As "More Power" stated above a fan clutch that engages sooner than the GM stock clutch works wonders. My A/C never cooled very well from new, but adding John Kennedy's clutch and composite fan made the A/C work excellent in the summer when in traffic. It really moves some air.
Each year or so, pull the radiator and clean it out of all the bugs and debri that gets into the fins, I also ran a bug screen to keep most of the critters out of the radiator.
Watch your pyrometer, and back off as it nears 1100 degrees pre-turbo.
All I can say is heat kills :rolleyes: almost anything, man or machine. Keep it cool. ;)

DA BIG ONE
04-08-2005, 11:37
I have been considering the crossover setup for the rear of the cylinder heads, ports are already there for this mod and it is explaned here http://www.humvee.net/hid/engine/ the look under "cracked blocks".

I wonder why GM never offered this option?

JohnC
04-08-2005, 12:12
Originally posted by DA BIG ONE:
I have been considering the crossover setup for the rear of the cylinder heads, ...I wonder why GM never offered this option? Do a search in the topic. It's been discussed before. To say the least, there are differing opinions on it's value.

Craig M
04-08-2005, 12:23
Looks like a very simple install. You could remove then tap your existing covers, get a couple of hoses made up and do this on the cheap.

DA BIG ONE
04-09-2005, 09:07
Originally posted by DA BIG ONE: I have been considering the crossover setup for the rear of the cylinder heads, ...I wonder why GM never offered this option?


Originally posted by JohnC:Do a search in the topic. It's been discussed before. To say the least, there are differing opinions on it's value.

I did a search here and found nothing, any hints that can help find it?

DA BIG ONE
04-09-2005, 09:10
Originally posted by Craig M:
Looks like a very simple install. You could remove then tap your existing covers, get a couple of hoses made up and do this on the cheap. I am actually considering this route, keeping the cooling hoses the same size as the heater hoses. Tap for, or weld fittings easy, easy, thenwith the savings I can take the little lady out to a nice dinner.

More Power
04-09-2005, 09:56
I spoke with Bill Heath a while back, and was surprised that he had experimented with the rear coolant flow idea, and even developed a parts kit to accomplish a conversion.

Frankly, I'm highly skeptical about this approach to better cooling, but am open to changing my mind if I see some convincing data. I've studied the coolant flow paths through these engines, and (at this point in time) believe taking coolant out at the back of the cyl heads will result in higher cylinder head temperatures at the front.

Properly instrumented heads would provide convincing data, one way or the other.... We'll see.

MP

JohnC
04-09-2005, 10:51
Originally posted by DA BIG ONE:
I did a search here and found nothing, any hints that can help find it? [/QB]

Try searching for "Bypass Cooling".

mhagie
04-09-2005, 18:13
I am considering the rear coolant kit.
The compelling reason is that I have found that air is trapped at the back of the heads, because I tried to install a mechanical temp gauge at one of those ports and I could not get a true reading because of trapped air at the back of the head causing erratic readings.
I am thinking of using the AN -04 size hose which is 1/8 pipe and should be small enough to release any trapped air but not too large to interfere with any flow rates.
I don't think too much of the heater hose Tee so am thinking of tapping the crossover housing close to the heater hose outlet.
I seems to me some DP member has tried connecting a hose between the two rear ports but can't remember their results, good or bad.
Merle

damork
04-09-2005, 18:43
I've tried rear cooling kits on older diesels from GM (6V-53) under extreme heat conditions and it was a miserable failure. These tests were done in the Sahara and Persian Gulf.

Some theories to leave the thermostats out were also a disaster in the 2 cycle Detroit diesels as well as some Cat engines. Leaving them out caused hotspots in the back of the heads because flow was taking the path of lease resistance and not completely flowing through the heads.

Cooling paths in these engines have taken years to develop and most of the time the people that design them have done a good job.

tom.mcinerney
04-09-2005, 18:55
OK,
If Merle got air there, that justifies a little bleed...

Related question:
When discussing replacement of the leak-prone heater hose/tube termination , Damork suggested going to the GM dealer, and procuring a nipple from a 6.2 , as that incorporates a designed-in restriction {then a short length of hose suffices connecting to the tube, which has been trimmed}.

What is the purpose of the designed-in restriction here?? Is the consideration a quick warmup ? Presumably both the engine and heater would warm faster in cold temps with an optimal restriction.

DA BIG ONE
04-10-2005, 01:04
It appears then there is no real data, on ya or nae with this mod.

Water wetter will surely help, but it will find a way to exit a cooling system that is not in perfect condition.

I did notice the hummer guy said the crossover does even out temps, but in the equasion is the hummers engine compartment and drivetrain tunnel which sux when it comes to airflow our trucks have much better airflow through these areas.

I guess I will get in touch with Bill too and get his input.

Any of you know if those water jacket ports are used on marine applications? Then wonder if there is as much failure w/cracking in marine applications?

mhagie
04-10-2005, 05:39
Since I can't remember the exact problems I had with a mechanical gauge in the rear crossover port I will do it again so all will know.
Right now I have the factory temp sender in the factory location in the left head, I have a mechanical gauge probe tee in the crossover/thermostat housing prior to the heater hose outlet nipple and a 195* stat.
I can remove the glowplug controller and install a Nordskog Digital gauge that I changed out cause If the sun shined on it I could not read it.
This way I can sense temps from three locations and REALLY confuse matters.
It seems to me that at the time I had the digital in the left head and the factory in the right rear crossover and it was reading temps around 210*plus altho its hard to say with the factory gauge, all w/195 stat.
This engine is basically a 599 6.2 block bored to 6.5 specs with 84 6.2 accessories.
Merle
PS digital gauges oil & temp for sale :D

Cowracer
04-11-2005, 09:26
From what I see, this kit TAKES water out of the heads at the rear. Probably not good.

Has anyone ever thought about ADDING water to the heads at this point. On our circle track cars when we ran 406CI motors (400 SBC .030 over) we had a terrible time keeping them cool.

One engine guy came up with a deal that drilled and tapped a ~1/4" hole in each "arm" (outlet port) of the water pump and attached fittings and hoses to that location to take cool water directly to the ports drilled and tapped into the heads. It worked pretty darn good, too.

Tim

HammerWerf
04-12-2005, 07:31
Folks,

I currently have a temperature guage plumbed into the glowplug controller spot on my 1983 CC.

The controller died, and I took the opportunity to see what the water temperature looked like

back there above #7 cylinder. I installed the gauge in early Feb. just prior my taking a trip to LA

over the Grapevine on I-5. I knew that this would be the quickest way to see what kind of

temperatures the engine produces in the back of the heads. GMCTD had an excellent post on

the 'Place' about the internal flow characterists of our heads. GRAPE too, asked very good

questions and posted solutions that I think are possible to implement, how, I don't know yet. They

got me to thinking about the idea of shunting water from the back of the head to the heater line,

like the hummer guys proposed.

Bit on the engine. A MR. Goodwrench replacement by the previous owner, single 195F

thermostat and stock water pump(66gpm?)

Average trip temps were in the mid 50's for the trip. Here is what I can remember at the moment.

Shotgun rider recorded data at the time including altitude. Will transcribe and post later.

At speed up to 45mph, the temp difference was 20F back to front. Front was 195F and the

back was 175F.

From 45 to 60mph, the difference was 15F. Front was 200F, rear 185F.

At 60 to 70mph, the difference was 10F. Front was 215, rear 205.

I has just cleaned the bugs out of the radiator, and the A/C condensor was removed at the time of

the trip.

I still have the gauge installed, awaiting warmer weather.

On another note, I have found an ad in "Drive Magazine" ( caters to the Hot Rod set) for an
outfit in PA that sells a kit to modify the oil pan so you can take off the sump without taking the whole pan off. Kinda like a DuraMax. Might be of use to monitor some of the motors being

built. No web page, but I will post the Name and phone number.

HammerWerf

ace58
04-14-2005, 02:18
While changing engines, I drilled and tapped the plates for either -6 or -8 hose and fittings, installed a tee between lines from each head and extended line down to rear heater connection hose at passenger side of transmission. A real clean installation with great results. This allows coolant to circulate evenly up through block.

I had been sent a link to the hummer mod site about a year ago, but it seemed like a lot of money for what they were offering.

DA BIG ONE
04-14-2005, 03:44
Originally posted by ace58:
While changing engines, I drilled and tapped the plates for either -6 or -8 hose and fittings, installed a tee between lines from each head and extended line down to rear heater connection hose at passenger side of transmission. A real clean installation with great results. This allows coolant to circulate evenly up through block.

I had been sent a link to the hummer mod site about a year ago, but it seemed like a lot of money for what they were offering. I see it is a 1999 truck, how about letting us know why you had to change out the motor, what is the engine code of the bad one, how about truck build date too?

JohnC
04-14-2005, 08:53
It would seem to me that the numbers posted by HammerWerf do not support the idea of a hot spot at the back of the heads and further imply that taking water from there would increase temps in the front. Am I missing something?

DA BIG ONE
04-14-2005, 10:25
Originally posted by JohnC:
It would seem to me that the numbers posted by HammerWerf do not support the idea of a hot spot at the back of the heads and further imply that taking water from there would increase temps in the front. Am I missing something? It is an early 80's truck w/I am guessing a 6.2 n/a motor. Perhaps, Dr. Lee can join in on this topic too.

This just shows how little data there is on this subject.

Kennedy
04-15-2005, 06:01
Originally posted by JohnC:
It would seem to me that the numbers posted by HammerWerf do not support the idea of a hot spot at the back of the heads and further imply that taking water from there would increase temps in the front. Am I missing something? IMHO, this mod is going in reverse as JC suspects...

mhagie
04-15-2005, 08:40
I admit John C may be correct and soon I will have temp probes on mine and see what it does.
If by chance it is cooler on the back cyls why does GM run more clearance on cyls 7&8? don't need more clearance if cyls run cooler does one?
there again I have the Penninsular 110 gpm water pump whether it makes a difrernce or not I don't know.......Merle

HammerWerf
04-15-2005, 08:41
Folks,

Here is the data for the trip over the Grapevine.

Sorry for the compressed format. I used notepad to write up the post, then copy/paste.

Time Altitude Speed Tfront Trear

1611 397ft 48 195F 175F
1625 405 60 210 195
1640 310 60 205 190
1700 658 60 210 195
1702 Grapvine begins 60 215 195
1704 GPS Failed 60 215 195
1705 60 215 195
1707 Rd Flattened 60 205 195
1709 6% grade restarts 60 205 195
1712 Tejon Pass Summit 4140 60 210 195
1714 3775 62 195 180
1718 2917 62 195 180
1724 2836 63 205 180
1727 2915 58 205 190
1733 2766 50 205 190
1737 2278 47 185 170
1739 906 47 150 170

The GPS stoped displaying altitude near the begining
of the Grapevine. Restart corrected the readout.
Times 1733 - 1739 were a long downhill into Lake Casatic
using engine compression to control speed.

More vehicle information. I used the 1983 CrewCab for this
Data collection effort. The engine is a 6.2l N/A
Mr Goodwrench replacement. Transmission is the TH-400
with the stock tranny oil cooler,and the rearend gear
is 4.10. The add on Temperature gauge was above #7 cylinder,
the front temp. sender is the stock
gauge. No pyrometer is installed, so I don't know what the
exhaust temps looked like. Belts were tight, and the sender
was bled of air for good liquid contact. Tires are 235/85 R 16.

The gauge is still hooked up and allowing me to see what is happening
in city driving. Weather here is still cool, helping the radiator
do its job.

The Oil Pan Modification kit I mentioned in my earlier post is

Trappe Automotive
804 W. Main Street
Trappe, PA 19426

(610) 489-7270
(610) 489-8216 fax

Their product is called
Easy Access Two Piece Oil Pan

Drive magazines webb site is www.driveonline.com (http://www.driveonline.com)
I get the paper version here in Bakersfield

HammerWerf

[ 04-15-2005, 08:55 AM: Message edited by: HammerWerf ]

JeffsTowTruck
04-15-2005, 14:38
MP
FROM 1997 NEWER DO WE NEED TO BE WORRIED ABOUT COOLING.. ALL I KEEP SEEING IS THAT PRIOR TO 97 THE COOLING NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED..GM MADE CHANGES TO THE 97, THAT FIXED THE PROBLEM, RIGHT? MY 97 HAS NOT GIVEN ME ANY REASON TO BE CONCERNED. THE FACTORY GAUGE DOES GO TO 210 TO 215 RANGE ONLY WHEN I AM PULLIN FULLY LOADED ON A STEEP GRADE. ONCE I REACH THE TOP IT WILL COME BACK TO NORM.. SO SHOULD I DO SOMETHING OR AM I OK ???????(ALL MY COOLING IS STOCK) :confused: :confused:

Kennedy
04-20-2005, 10:38
Originally posted by JEFF'S TOW TRUCK:
MP
FROM 1997 NEWER DO WE NEED TO BE WORRIED ABOUT COOLING.. ALL I KEEP SEEING IS THAT PRIOR TO 97 THE COOLING NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED..GM MADE CHANGES TO THE 97, THAT FIXED THE PROBLEM, RIGHT? MY 97 HAS NOT GIVEN ME ANY REASON TO BE CONCERNED. THE FACTORY GAUGE DOES GO TO 210 TO 215 RANGE ONLY WHEN I AM PULLIN FULLY LOADED ON A STEEP GRADE. ONCE I REACH THE TOP IT WILL COME BACK TO NORM.. SO SHOULD I DO SOMETHING OR AM I OK ???????(ALL MY COOLING IS STOCK) :confused: :confused: You have the best water pump system available for the 6.5, and really the only way to improve this would be to add my fan clutch to keep peak temps down a bit.

Intercooling plays a HUGE roll in operating temps, underhood temps, and performance also...

G. Gearloose
04-20-2005, 11:56
Originally posted by mhagie:
If by chance it is cooler on the back cyls why does GM run more clearance on cyls 7&8? don't need more clearance if cyls run cooler does one?Yes, I think one does need more clearance on cooler cyllinders, since the pistons expand about the same when they see similar combustion temps.

JeffsTowTruck
04-20-2005, 18:52
KENNEDY smile.gif
THANKS FOR THE INFO.. THAT WILL GIVE ME SOMETHING ELSE TO SHOOT FOR...(EXTRA MONEY MONTH)
ALSO THE FPPF TOTAL POWER YOU HAVE IS GOOD STUFF. I CAN TELL A DIFF. WHEN I USE IT. I SAVE IT FOR WHEN I AM TOWING, IT HAS A LITTLE EXTRA KICK.
ALL THIS TALK OF COOLING THE CYL HEADS AND STUFF HAD ME A BIT CONCERNED. FEEL BETTER NOW!!

Kennedy
04-21-2005, 08:05
I thought I read somewhere about a truck being equipped with 6 temp probes per head or something like that???

toyboxrv
05-02-2005, 18:12
I installed a second gauge on the passenger side head at the rear a couple of years ago. I had at the time the 97+ cooling mods and an intercooler. At high elevation hills in hot weather I would see nearly 20* higher temps at the rear mounted gauge. At that point I installed two out the plates from an early 6.2 that were tapped for 1/2" pipe and connected 8AN fittings running the hose to the engine side of the thermostat housing. Since that time temps have been at least 5* lower at the max on the trucks gauge and 10* - 15* less at the rear gauge. I have been told on a couple of occasions that this idea won't work, but for two years it has not done anything but reduce overall temps and more importantly has dropped the differential some between front and back on the engine. If I were to do it again I would stick with the 8AN, but feed them to a y connector that would go to a single 12AN to the thero housing.

eracers999
05-09-2005, 17:21
Not enough can be said about intercooling, if you want to scare yourself hook up a scanner and do some towing, lock in the intake air temp and watch it. I did this and as a result i was afraid to put wy foot in it until it was intercooled. I just did my intercooler upgrade and am very impressed with the results. Stop and think about it, you can do all the cooling mods you want but when you are pumping air in at 275 to 300 deg its a wonder that it can cool at all. Not to mention the fact that the ds4 pump is being baked. How, glad you asked, when the intake piping is hotter than the upper coolant hose and all that sits right over the pump its a wonder the darn thing even works.

Kent

dandiesel
05-11-2005, 00:59
Own a 1996 6.5td K2500 suburban. Been recently doing some cooling mods. Got from SSdiesel 21"fan and clutch, 130 gpm pump and air intake upgrades. Do I still need a dual stat crossover housing? My sub has 2 t stats original.

jspringator
05-11-2005, 03:37
I recently installed a B&M transmission cooler with thermostatically controlled fan UNDER the truck, and on my trip to Dega it seemed to run cooler. Coolant guage never rose over 210, even on steep pulls.

rvray
05-13-2005, 04:31
Hey Guys

Can recommend the cooling Mods from Kennedy's.

Got a 6.5Lt TD in an Rv and was having terrible trouble with cooling in the South of France with ambient temps around 30C. Constantly in the red on gradients !!
Now it hardly moves off the 1/2 way mark!
Brilliant ! ;) :cool:

DIRTYBIRD
05-17-2005, 16:02
My '93 pusher motorhome has been fitted with most of the usual cooling mods except an intercooler. The fan is direct drive, without a clutch. Always looking for improvement, I added sheetmetal baffles behind the radiator that forced the air that had been heated by the radiator to go to the rear of the coach before exiting. This dropped my indicated coolant temp. by 25-30 F. I suspect that, without the baffles, hot air was circulating back to the forward side of the radiator. It would seem that much more effort needs to be made to not only get air through the radiator but to prevent recirculation