PDA

View Full Version : Tires: Load Range D versus Load Range E



Roy W
10-30-2005, 06:01
I anticipate upgrading my 245/75/16E Bridgestone highway tread tires for something a little more agressive and at the same time switch to a larger 265/75/16 tire. My 245 load range E tires have a capacity of 3042 lbs at 80 psi. 265's are available in both load range D with a capacity of 3000 lbs at 65 psi or load range E with a capacity of 3415 at 80 psi.

The hitch weight of my Jayco TT is 920 lbs which with a weight distribution hitch should be divided between the front and rear axles of the truck. Lets say 500 lbs on the rear axle, a Honda generator at 140 lbs, auxiliary fuel of 60 gallons for another 500 lbs, and another 200 lbs of "stuff," for a total of 1340 lbs.

My question is: With the 265 load range D tires having virtually the same capacity as the 245 load range E tires, what are the advantages or disadvantages of buying the 265 load range D tires instead of the E's. Obviously, the load capacity is greater with the E's, but what about ride comfort? Presently when running unloaded now, I only carry 50 psi in the front and rear with the 245 E's. How would the 265 E's wear running unloaded with only 50 psi. Note: these will be mounted on the stock PYO rims.

MTTwister
10-30-2005, 09:09
Roy - I'm been doing the same self-debate for my '96. I don't currently tow - but might in a few years. The 255/85's would give me an effective rear end reduction from 3.73 to about 3.42. Some Load rage's E's have a greater carrying capacity "rating"- maybe up to 3400#. Sased on your current configuration, it's pretty much a wash - laod wise.
note - the current 245's are the OEM's smile.gif . They may rot off before I wear them out.

DA BIG ONE
10-31-2005, 00:47
Expect softer ride w/"d", and more body roll if you do not have rear sway bar.